When it comes to underwater monitoring, sound is the scientist’s secret weapon. Choosing between passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) and active sonar depends on your research goals, target species or objects, and deployment environment.
At Turbulent Research, we design and deploy acoustic technology for both passive and active applications, and we know that choosing the right approach can make or break a project. Here’s a breakdown of the key differences, use cases, and what to consider before you deploy.
Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is a method of listening to underwater soundscapes without transmitting any sound into the environment. Instead, it captures naturally occurring sounds-from whale songs and dolphin clicks to ship traffic and seismic activity-using sensitive underwater microphones called hydrophones.
This non-intrusive approach is widely used in marine research, particularly when the goal is to observe without influencing the behavior of wildlife. PAM systems are often deployed on moorings, buoys, or autonomous platforms and can record continuously for weeks or even months.
At Turbulent Research, our TR-PORPOISE and TR-FLOAT platforms are built to meet the highest standards of acoustic clarity and reliability. With exceptional sensitivity and ultra-low noise electronics, these systems deliver high-resolution sound data-even in noisy or challenging offshore conditions. Whether you're monitoring for regulatory compliance or leading a biodiversity study, our PAM systems offer the tools to capture sound science, literally.
Active sonar is a technique that sends out sound pulses—often called “pings”—into the water and listens for the echoes that bounce back after hitting objects or surfaces. By analyzing the time delay and characteristics of these returning echoes, researchers can determine the distance, size, shape, and movement of underwater features and targets.
Unlike passive acoustic monitoring, which listens to existing sounds in the environment, active sonar creates its own acoustic signal. This makes it especially valuable in situations where the goal is to locate, map, or quantify underwater structures or objects that don’t produce sound themselves.
While active sonar offers a powerful way to “see” underwater, it’s essential to weigh its technical benefits against environmental considerations. At Turbulent Research, we work closely with clients to ensure that acoustic systems are tuned for both scientific precision and ecological responsibility—whether that means integrating active sonar into multi-sensor platforms or supplementing it with passive acoustic tools.
Here are a few key questions to help guide your decision:
In some projects, a hybrid approach offers the best results. For example, you might use PAM to track whale vocalizations while simultaneously using active sonar to avoid collisions or map habitat features.
At Turbulent Research, we can help design integrated systems that bring both methods together, giving you the most complete picture of what’s happening underwater.
Both passive acoustic monitoring and active sonar play vital roles in marine science and monitoring. The best choice depends on what you’re listening for, where you’re working, and how much interaction with the environment is acceptable.
Need help choosing or designing a system? Get in touch with our team, we’re always happy to help guide your next deployment.